Unusual cartoon light years away from the Disney production, but also very different from everything that we were accustomed to see represented with a technique classically designed for children. "
Mr. Fox lives with his wife, son-complex and non-integrated and nephew, writes a column in the local newspaper, but dreams of the golden days in which raided chicken coops, turkeys killed with one bite and gave free rein to his being wild animal. With a companion in adventure takes the life of illegally plundering, to irritate the three largest local breeders who join forces to exterminate all the local game. Fox should save the lives of his loved ones and neighbors ...
Adapted from a story by R. Dahl, the film drags a bit 'for the first half hour, but has some really innovative features the definition of these animals so little humanized (as they would eat the real wild animals, they run on the walls of the burrow in situations of stress) and no sugar. If with Shrek (the first, the sequels are horrible) are witnessing an ironic reversal of the topoi of the tale, here are the characters-even bad ones, or at least ambiguous-thinkers predators without any false sentimentality. Although not greatly love the graphic technique employed (stop motion), W. Anderson has put together an extremely interesting product, finished with a voice-delicious.
Mr. Fox lives with his wife, son-complex and non-integrated and nephew, writes a column in the local newspaper, but dreams of the golden days in which raided chicken coops, turkeys killed with one bite and gave free rein to his being wild animal. With a companion in adventure takes the life of illegally plundering, to irritate the three largest local breeders who join forces to exterminate all the local game. Fox should save the lives of his loved ones and neighbors ...
Adapted from a story by R. Dahl, the film drags a bit 'for the first half hour, but has some really innovative features the definition of these animals so little humanized (as they would eat the real wild animals, they run on the walls of the burrow in situations of stress) and no sugar. If with Shrek (the first, the sequels are horrible) are witnessing an ironic reversal of the topoi of the tale, here are the characters-even bad ones, or at least ambiguous-thinkers predators without any false sentimentality. Although not greatly love the graphic technique employed (stop motion), W. Anderson has put together an extremely interesting product, finished with a voice-delicious.
0 comments:
Post a Comment