Yellow Chunky Discharge

That fanatic Livio Fanzaga

'It is true that I take pleasure around atheists .. is very true .. I saw a website that tells me that priest there was little Christian spirit, he mocks us atheists ... I understood .. the funny thing is that I would approve of them ... they want the blessing on their atheism .. I confess that I tease her instead of them .. but I do not tease them because they despise, but to show how are cleft! .. atheism is a form unacceptable a view of life .. so depressing. " front of this statement is easily led to believe that it is simply a bad humor against a Catholic world in their uncomfortable as that of the party could not credenti.In esserlo.Ma just a name to clarify things: I speak of Father Livio Fanzaga, Italian priest of the order of Piarist, director of Radio Maria, best known for his controversial comments about the students and faculty of the University "La Sapienza" that preceded the decline of Rome by the Holy See that the invitation was addressed to the rector of the Pope to intervene in the inauguration of accademico.Laureato in theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University (Rome) and in philosophy from the 'Catholic University (Milan), radically changes his life after a pilgrimage to Medjugorje . "I had as an inner call" says, "was vita.Da me for a change then I started listening to the messages of Our Lady. " Considered by some as a leading expert on Marian apparitions, believes the messages of Our Lady of Medjugorje presumed that led him to collaborate with Radio Maria.Sicuramente convinced of his faith, strengthened by this experience, always speaks in a forthright defense of his faith and the Catholic Church, but with a particular weapon and a disarmingly fanatismo.A the witnesses are not only his many catechetical found in the archives of the site of his radio, but his comment printing and various interviews with radio, newspapers and programs televisivi.Dichiara openly and repeatedly that behind every action against the Church and against the faith diavolo.Vede there is, in fact, the devil in all that is simply "different" from Catholicism and Catholics on the parameters, leaving escape his fanaticism and nonsense spreads. "Imagine I am here to Herb, I hear from here the smell of sulfur that is there," he said referring to comments popular on YouTube and blogs that criticize his fanaticism "say ah the Director of radio maria (and before continuing precise) but it was a gay blog I do not know that stuff was there wisdom says that those who have set up this casinotto are horned, devil are you .. and sorry if scandalizzavano.Ma believe in the devil do you shocked "at dd in the end that these people there is squattrinata.Solo this comment to the criticisms of him, through not only his usual contempt for what he calls" penniless " but also the homophobia of this individuo.Omofobia that, among other things, is present in many men of the Church and Catholic brainwashed by the latter, even if the reality shows that is also present outside the Catholic sphere.

Against Eugenio Scalfari, founder of The Republic , said "I saw the other night on television that the poor Scalfari spoke like a priest of atheism and I said, is blinded! do not see anything! do not see anything! any -.. an old, uneducated who can not write, he knows more than he is, what life, what is good what is evil! knows less than my cat! and we believe also smart! how foolish I am! "he added " this is the lack of faith! absence of faith also the reason unreason (..) What are these atheists! that there is a reason! have lost the light of reason obscured by the passions because (..) you do not know who you are, nor where you come from, nor where you go, nor what is good or what is evil, nor is death! What do you know! do not know anything! Who are you? are zero! (..) Die as die (again referred to the atheists) die like animals who do not understand! (..) When it penetrates the darkness and takes us too, we do not see anything, we no longer see the beauty of the Church, with its faults is the source of holiness. "

E 'right distance from any of fanaticism, whether religious or atheist it, but the shame grows mainly in front of the first case and that is religious fanaticism, where the subject should be a believer in a God who loves his children, without distinction of sex, religion and thought. But the contradictions of these people are still placing the individual in a number of uncertainties represented not only by the existence of a God or not, but also on the nature of an alleged God, right or ingiusto.Dopotutto however, this is the manual management of the masses by many members of the Church, that is to be labeled "satanic" all those things that loved and still love to call heretical scomode.Il biggest problem is that the masses continue to keep their eyes closed and not take coscienza.Il respect for anyone, that it is a believer, agnostic, atheist, women, men, gay, lesbian, is the foundation of civilization of a popolo.Evidentemente some do not even know what it means to be civili.E 'intolerable thought obscurantist, medieval and disrespectful of many Catholic priests of our secolo.La "light of reason" cattolici.La not part of the reason is not only synonymous with religion or fede.Esso part of man. And when it is first used the self.

Fanzaga Of course, as mentioned above, not only lashes out against atheists, but also on those who are not Catholics, who profess a different religione.In maybe one of his catechesis, in fact, said that after his trip Medjugorje felt the "real presence of Mary and that before that happens" studying "the different religions as well " Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, especially as regards the last (?), the Bhagavad Gita " because "when I was in Milan, there were many of these movements Hare Krishna." Well, claimed to have stopped since then because "perceiving Maria knew that the only true religion is Christianity" and therefore no longer feels compelled to know, but to teach them the true faith only in Cristo.Rivela therefore also contributes to proselyte proselyte part-inevitable-especially cristiani.A that characterizes this point there is a clear question of how to reconcile the supposed "peace messages" of Mary in Medjugorje with a proselytizing antidialogo.La the answer is propio in the alleged messages: "Our Lady of Medjugorje" in the message of July 24, 1982 said to the seers "When you die you leave the ground in full consciousness that we have now. At the time of death and 'conscious of the separation of body and soul. is wrong to teach people that born again 'times and that the soul passes in different bodies . We are born only once and after death the body decomposes and relive 'more'. Each man then receive 'a transfigured body. Even those who have hurt a lot during his earthly life can 'go straight to heaven if at the end of life sincerely repents of his sins, he confessed himself present. " This sentence highlights the opposition from the alleged Mary's reincarnation, which as is well known, embraces the belief of different religions orientali.E ', therefore, a sentence that reflects the Fanzaga spirit, but also reflects the spirit of many cattolici.E if the Catholic fanaticism to reflect the spirit of the "Madonna"?. The doubt arises by reading the contradictions in some messaggi.Il January 10, 1983, Mirjana, one of seers, when questioned by Tomislav Vlasic, said "Our Lady has often said that believers, especially in the villages, for example, here in Medjugorje, are opposed to the Orthodox and Muslims. It is not a good thing. It also said that there is one God and that men are divided. You are not Christian if you do not respect other religions, Muslim and Serbian ". What does the" Madonna ", therefore, contradicts, in a sense, what he said the year before with reincarnation, simply because of respect for religion also provides no "verdict" true or false belief that life after death, that it be reincarnation or heaven and therefore serious doubts as to the inferno.Sorgono Verica of appearances, both on the nature of the alleged suspects messaggi.Lascia perverted the mentality of many Catholics, ready to erase traces of "equality" with other faiths that could leak in that message to Mirjana reported: according to the second and theologian René Laurentin also a site of a Catholic Christian, Aldo Galli "these messages are problematic among those who claim to respect for other religions, which could be interpreted as if in the end all religions were equal before Dio.Ciò requires an important clarification, since that statement is contrary to Catholic doctrine, which - in the conciliar Constitution Lumen Gentium of Vatican II - is limited only to say that in each of the major religions there is good and true, but that knowledge of God from other religions is still partial: only in Jesus Christ gives the full revelation of divine truth and only through Jesus Christ is fulfilled salvation of mankind. " writes the webmaster Catholic " It is important to remember the messages of the first anniversary of the apparitions were not systematically collected and therefore the reconstruction that ensued was fragmented and not without difficulty. "The reconstruction by whom? And how it was done this reconstruction?. He goes Galli saying that" respect other religions, therefore, do not mean to offend people who practice them. It is therefore of the people, not religions, not the truth they bring. " We therefore draw some conclusions and possible solutions are many but two in particular, that is, or the apparitions of Medjugorje are false or, if they are true, there is manipulation cattolica.Ma was inclined to think that the answer is the former.

How surprising, then, that a father Livio Fanzaga comments and look with contempt on the superiority of his chair, whatever that is different from Catholic thought? After all, is the philosophy of many Catholics, except those who can still think with his own head. 'true that every religion proclaims its truth, but neither does it exactly like Catholicism represented by those many people of the Church, which, even wanting, demonstrates several times to have bases deep antidialogo, always willing to convert and never converted.

Best Cycling Shoes For Achilles

Hypatia, a victim of Christian fanaticism

"When I see you I prostrate myself before
you and your words, seeing the astral house of the virgin, in fact, the sky is for your every act Hypatia sacred beauty of the word, a star of the wise pristine culture. "
(PD)

Hypatia (Hypatia) of Alexandria was the first woman to make a substantial contribution to the development of the daughter of the mathematician and matematica.Era philosopher Theon of Alexandria and is almost certain that she studied mathematics under the guidance and instruction of his father. Rather, it is important to note that Hypatia became head of the Platonic school in Alexandria, Here in about 400 AD, he gave lessons in mathematics and philosophy, in particular teaching the philosophy of Neoplatonism. Hypatia based his teachings on those of Plato, the founder of Neoplatonism, and Iamblichus, who was a developer of Neoplatinismo, who lived around 300 dCPlatone teaches that there is an ultimate reality, which was beyond the reach of thought or speech. The purpose of life is to aim at this ultimate reality that can not be described accurately. Plato put emphasis on the fact that people do not have the mental capacity necessary to fully understand both the ultimate reality, and the consequences of its existence. Iamblichus distinguished further away layers of reality, placed in a hierarchy beneath the ultimate reality. There was a level of reality corresponding to every single thought, which the human mind was capable. Hypatia taught these philosophical ideas with an emphasis on scientific greater than the followers of Neoplatinismo. In fact it is described by all commentators as a teacher very carismatica.Insegnò mathematics, philosophy, astronomy and mechanics, and his house became an intellectual center. None of his writings (born as texts for students) has been preserved intact, however it seems that part of his work has been incorporated in the works of Theon. He became interested in the study of conics and wrote a collection of tables on celestial bodies. Hypatia became interested also of mechanics and technology, designed scientific instruments including a flat astrolabe, an instrument to measure the water level, an apparatus for distillation and a brass hydrometer for determining the gravity (density) of a liquid.

There is no evidence that Hypatia has undertaken a mathematical research originale.Comunque, she saw her father, Theon of Alexandria, in writing his commentary, in eleven parts on 'Ptolemy's Almagest. It is also believed that she has assisted her father in the production of a new version of Euclid's Elements, which became the basis for all subsequent editions of the works of Euclid. Heath writes on the edition of Theon and Hypatia of The Elements:
"... while the others were only trivial additions to the content of The Elements, he tried to remove the difficulties which might be encountered dailettori during the study of the book as a modern publisher would examine a classic textbook for school use, and there is no dubbioche his edition was approved by its students of Alexandria, for whom it was written, as well as by the Greeks, who used almost exclusively that ... "In addition to
work with his father, Hypatia wrote commentaries on Diophantus's Arithmetic, on the Conics of Apollonius and Ptolemy's astronomical works, although some historians doubt that Hypatia has written commentaries on Ptolemy. Hypatia
symbolized the doctrine and science, which early Christians identified with paganism. However, among men who taught in Alexandria, there were many Christian important. One of the most famous is Synesius of Cyrene, who became, later, the Bishop of Ptolemais. Many of the letters he wrote to Hypatia Synesius were preserved and we know that many were filled with admiration and reverence for his knowledge and his scientific skills.
In 412, Cyril (later St Cyril) became patriarch of Alexandria, while the Roman prefect of Alexandria was Orestes. Cyril and Orestes became bitter political rivals as church and state, fighting for control of territory. Hypatia was a friend of Orestes, and this, together with the effect that the Christians had towards his philosophical point of view, made it the focal point of riots between Christians and non-Christians. Hypatia, Heath writes,:
"... by ... his eloquence and authority gained such influence that Christianity considered it a threat ..."

In March 415, on the order of Cyril of Alexandria, a group of Christian fanatics surprised the philosopher as he returned home, pulled off the stretcher, dragged her into the church built on Cesareion and brutally killed, skinned up bones (according to some sources using ostrakois - literally "oyster shells," but the term was also used to indicate tiles or fragments), and dragging the remains in a place called Cinarion, where they were bruciati.Sono been made various assumptions about the motive of the Christians, the most plausible set forth by various historians, states that the indirect cause was the third of the 391 edict of Emperor Theodosius I, which in practice favored legalizing the persecution and anti-pagan, who obviously intensified, many faithful Christians heard Theodosius authorized by law to initiate a real manhunt in an attempt to physically eliminate the pagans and destruction of their temples.
At that time the bishop of Alexandria Teofilo was: he began a long and violent campaign of destruction of temples. In particular, it was besieged by the Christians the Temple of Serapis (a temple dedicated to Serapis, Egyptian god greek-which combines Zeus and Osiris). Bishop Theophilus and the Prefect Evagrius, along with the men of the garrison, he began the work of demolition. Bishop Theophilus wanted to set a good example for the first hitting the colossal statue of the god Serapis. Adjacent to the temple there was the library of Serapeion, the younger of the two of Alexandria (the other was the famous library of the Museum) that was set on fire by soldiers encouraged by Christians. Theophilus died in 412 and his responsibility passed to his nephew Cyril (of which was his uncle Theophilus), which became among other things, the Patriarch of Alexandria. As mentioned above, the prefect of Alexandria had contrast with Orestes and Cyril was a friend of Hypatia: this would cost him dear friends uncomfortable during the worst of the repression. Many argue that Bishop Cyril was responsible for this shameful act because it "could not know." According to some, Cyril was opposed to this barbaric act, but according to others he was the instigator of the murder. In any case, everything that happened during the reign of the minor Theodosius II (ruled by Pulcheria sister), so should be around 415 to the Common Era.
After the death of his faithful students fled Hypatia of Alexandria, thereby leaving the city its destination: the world famous Egyptian consequently lost its characteristic as a city of culture.

How Many Options On A 3 Number Combination Lock

Membership: the end of a freedom

And 'interesting to see what' said the current Pope Benedict XVI, at the opening of the fifth meeting of the Latin American, with regard to ' obvious proselytizing operated by the Catholic Church. "The Church does not proselytize," the pontiff said, "feels disciple, having received the Gospel, just as a disciple and missionary. As Christ draws all to himself with the power of his love, so the Church fulfills its mission in accordance with spiritual and practical to love the Lord. " I think however this claim has not only served to confirm what the spirit is always tied to the Christian, namely, a proselytizing disguised and justified by the 'innocent apostolic spirit "and, therefore, the word spirit missionario.Ma analiza" missionary. "Missionary is one who is committed to spreading a religion in areas where there is still diffusa.Da this explanation can think of ways and violent crimes with which the Church has always spread its doctrine and its fede.Basti think of the "Holy Inquisition, the Crusades, or the first missions in the past America.Nel Christian missionaries were an integral part of colonialism, such as during European colonization of the Americas, Africa and Asia, sometimes the result was the destruction of entire ancient cultures, religions and traditional peoples conquistati.Un 'element that you can not escape the history of the missions is that of' Use of Force: initially expected, assuming that the Indians were opposed to reductions in segregation, and repressive techniques inquisitorie.Tuttavia we soon realized that to achieve real results were then passed to change approccio.Si ostentation of force : you acknowledge the destructive power of the Indian and European arms if you put the choice to be with or against loro.Solo later, with the Salesian missions in mid-nineteenth century changed the approach, based on a different conception of human life, although already in 1622 the Congregation Propaganda Fide had declared that it was now necessary to "renounce the use of the Inquisition and despair in the arts of persuasion," a statement that did not provide However, the disappearance of the disturbing "Courts of Conscience", nor a human approach by the Church towards its faithful and non.Oggi you may think that the Church has completely stopped the violence, but not exactly così.In Actually now I use some more "soft" compared to the previous raid in the secular life and the ever-proselytizing.
The mission, therefore, is born assumed to know a single unquestionable truth, and then the faithful must be brought to disseminate to convert "sinners" and bring the world together in 'one truth: Is this love or fanaticism? is a good basis for a dialogue? Where did it go and free will that usually, as the believers say, God gives to his children? Normal .. then hearing news of Christians forced or violent reactions by fanatics, simply because every religion shout the truth, so that the proselyte is an "invader." I think the proselytizing, such as the spread of a faith, or the most stupid and irrational that may exist on this planet, simply because the existence same of different religions, believers and nonbelievers, is proof of how there is no one truth and that the act of the mission is not simply the same old weapon used in different ways and from different religions to extend its power of and control or simply a spirit of presumption, all camouflage from a noble goal as the salvation of the world.

Waxing For Men Ottawa

Why "agnostic"?

First, it is extremely difficult to speak of agnosticism, this is because this word contains only one position, but it contains the term agnosticism tante.Teoricamente indicates a "suspension" of the proceedings with respect to a given problem (religious, political social, psychic, etc.).. However it manifests itself in thought in different ways: there are in fact agnostic completely indifferent to the problem of faith and others, in "research" and then there are the agnostics "Perm" (thus loses the meaning of "suspension"), namely those who claim that it is not humanly comprehensible the mystery of God's existence (but not only) and then it is not possible to know a risposta.Questa however, a further division is summarized in one aspect, however, individual groups and then as a whole, in fact, the 'agnosticism.
There is often confusion between atheism and agnosticism, but two things really that different from certain points of view can be simili.Ma depends on the point of application vista.Alla if agnostics are atheists, Bertrand Russell said: " No, an atheist, as a Christian, says that we can know whether God exists or not. A Christian argues that God exists, that there is an atheist. A agnostic, however, refrains from judging, saying that there are sufficient grounds to deny it is to say that. An agnostic can simultaneously assert that the existence of God, although not entirely impossible, it is still unlikely. It can get even to say that it is so unlikely that, in practice, it is not worth to take it into account, in which case, does not depart much from atheism. His attitude may be what you would have a conservative philosophy towards the gods of ancient Greece. If I were asked to prove that Zeus, Poseidon, Hera, and the rest of the Olympians do not exist, I could not find arguments entirely convincing. An agnostic may think that the existence of the Christian God is as unlikely as that of the gods of Olympus, in which case he will, from practical point of view, one with the atheists. "
Beyond the subject of our attention, be it God or anything else, I chose the title because Agnostic the most appropriate to my position and my thoughts, because for me it is extremely important to observe rationality and neutrality that surrounds us, because if we were to speak on something we will definitely without conditions and, where possible, we arrive at one of our real conclusion.